Topics

Review articles of association

Review existing clauses for gaps, contradictions and later conflict risks.

What matters legally

Reviewing existing articles means checking how shareholdings, voting rights, management, transfers and exit provisions work together. The key question is whether the document still fits the current shareholders, financing and family expectations.

Which clauses must be read together

Weak points often sit in outdated majority rules, vague consent matters, missing buy-out rights and compensation clauses without a workable valuation method. A change in one clause may affect majorities, notarial form and register steps.

What to prepare

Useful documents are the current articles, company register extract, cap table, known conflict points and planned amendments. This allows a quick view on whether a targeted amendment is enough or a consolidated rewrite is safer.

Review checkpoints

Compare current shareholdings and voting rights with the articles.
Check consent matters, vetoes and blocking minorities for practical use.
Read exit, exclusion, death and transfer provisions together.
Plan notarial form and register relevance before amendments.

Frequently asked questions

When is a limited amendment enough?

When one clearly defined point changes and the remaining structure still works. If several areas are weak, a consolidated version is usually safer.

Why review before a dispute starts?

In a dispute vague clauses become leverage. Before that, majorities, deadlines and exit scenarios can be ordered more calmly.

This information is initial orientation and does not replace legal advice for an individual case.